On November 7, 1967, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed into law the Public
Broadcasting Act.
The act
set up public broadcasting in the United States, by establishing the
Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which led to the creation of the Public
Broadcasting Service, or PBS, and National Public Radio.
After
signing the act into law, Johnson said that, “It announces to the world that
our Nation wants more than just material wealth; our Nation wants more than a
"chicken in every pot." We in America have an appetite for
excellence, too. While we work every day to produce new goods and to create new
wealth, we want most of all to enrich man's spirit. That is the purpose of this
act.”
The
Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 states that, “It is in the public interest to
encourage the growth and development of public radio and television
broadcasting, including the use of such media for instructional, educational,
and cultural purposes… it
is necessary and appropriate for the Federal Government to complement, assist,
and support a national policy that will most effectively make public
telecommunications services available to all citizens of the United States.”
When
public broadcasting in America was first established, the intent was that
Congress would provide funding to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting,
which would in turn divide that funding up among the various public television
and radio stations across the country.
This
worked great for years.
The
Public Broadcasting System and National Public Radio were able to bring millions
of Americans educational programming, independent news and political analysis
and a host of other culturally stimulating programs.
But
over time, federal funding to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting has been
slashed.
Today,
Conservative across America are slashing the budgets of their local public
television stations, arguing that the wide array of media offerings available
today makes public television as we know it obsolete.
Public
broadcasting institutions are now being forced to rely more and more on
corporate cash as a result of the huge drop in government funding.
This
means that PBS and NPR are now forced to filter what they play on their
airwaves, so that they don’t piss off their corporate backers.
This is
where the documentary “Citizen Koch” comes in.
“Citizen
Koch” is a documentary about money and politics, focusing heavily on the
uprising that took place in Wisconsin in 2011 and 2012.
It
talks about how the Citizens United decision paved the way for secretive
political spending by major players like the Koch Brothers.
The
documentary was originally supposed to air on PBS stations nationwide, but its
funding was abruptly cut off after David Koch became offended by another PBS
documentary that had been critical of billionaire industrialists trying to take
over the world in the wake of growing income inequality.
But why
would PBS care if David Koch didn’t like one of their documentaries?
Because
according to several reports, David Koch has donated upwards of $23 million to
public television. And when you donate
$23 million dollars to public television, you get more than just a totebag or a
coffee mug – you get a great deal of influence over the on-air programming.
This is
the kind of influence and control that we see in mainstream media today
too.
Thanks
to the giant transnational corporations that own them, mainstream media outlets
are forced to tailor their programming to appease their corporate backers.
While
we have come to accept and live with this kind of corporate control over
mainstream media in America, PBS and NPR have always been a breath of fresh
air, free from corporate dictatorship…until now.
It’s
time to take back our public airwaves, and cut-off the corporate control over
them, so that billionaires like David Koch don’t get to choose what you watch
on TV.
And the
only way to do that is by stopping the federal funding cuts to public radio and
television.
Call
your members of Congress, and tell them to protect funding to the Corporation
for Public Broadcasting, so that it can continue its work to “enrich man’s
spirit.”
No comments:
Post a Comment