Wednesday, February 20, 2013

The F-35 Folly

I want to tell you a story about political dysfunction in Washington.

Say hello to the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program.

The F-35 joint strike jet fighter is the costliest weapons programs in human history, with each plane costing $90 million and the project taking more than a decade to complete.

The price tag of the entire program has nearly doubled since 2001, coming in at a staggering $396 billion dollars.  And, thanks to a number of production delays and safety concerns, that price tag is still rising.

To give you a little more sense of just how expensive this project is, when you combine the price tag of the program with Government Accountability Office estimated operating and maintenance costs of the planes– the total cost of the program reaches over $1 trillion.   That’s more than the entire $700 billion TARP bank bailout.  And it’s even more than the entire GDP of Australia – which only comes in at $924 billion

Now here comes the really absurd part of this story. Thanks to the decade of delays, the technology in the F-35, once thought to be the best of the best, is now almost outdated.
The program is one of several in the current Pentagon budget that is stuck in the last century, and has failed to adapt to changes in modern day warfare.

Yet, the Pentagon officials, like current Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, are still pressing for nearly 2,500 F-35 Joint Strike Fighters.

At a press conference in Ottawa, Canada last Spring, Panetta told reporters that, quote, “As part of the defense strategy that the United States went through and has put in place, we have made very clear that we are 100 percent committed to the development of the F-35. It’s a fifth-generation fighter, [and] we absolutely need it for the future.”

What Panetta doesn’t realize is that over the course of the F-35 program, the world has changed.  The F-35 is supposed to be the future of U.S. tactical airpower, but the fact is the entire program is stuck in an era when the U.S. faced major and aggressive power rivals, which is simply not the case today. Rather than face the current threats of today, like cyber warfare, we continue to pour billions, and potentially trillions, into this bottomless pit of a project. 

So where is all the outrage to the incredible amounts of taxpayer money being thrown at the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter?

Well, as we all know, when it comes to defense spending and the American military industrial complex, Republicans don’t dare open their mouths.

And many Democrats are on board with the project too, most likely because components of the planes are made in their home districts, which means a boost to their local economies.

On March 1st, if lawmakers fail to reach a new federal budget deal, the automatic sequester cuts will go into effect.  Under these cuts, a variety of federal agencies and programs will lose funding, including the Pentagon. If those sequester cuts go into effect, the Pentagon will face more than $500 billion in spending cuts.  

That’s where Republican war hawks like Sen. Lindsey Graham come in.  Appearing on Fox News Sunday over the weekend, Graham said that, in order to avoid the looming sequester budget cuts that would  quote "destroy" the military , we should instead eliminate healthcare to the 30 million Americans who are covered under Obamacare.

Well, instead of taking healthcare away from millions of Americans, why don’t lawmakers in Washington do the unthinkable, and take away just a little bit of America’s military might.
The Pentagon is looking at $500 billion in budget cuts if the sequester goes into effect. Well, it just so happens that in the current Pentagon budget, there’s a program that’s incredibly outdated, ineffective and it just so happens to cost around $500 billion dollars.

The fact of the matter is eliminating the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program really won’t put much of a dent in America’s military power. 

As Congressman Justin Amash of Michigan, one of the few Republicans in favor of defense cuts, put it, quote, “We are spending maybe 45% of the world's budget on defense. If we drop to 42% or 43%, would we be suddenly in danger of some kind of invasion?”
No. We wouldn’t be.

But it would put a dent in the wallets of America’s war profiteers which really concerns Republicans like Lindsey Graham. 

He shouldn’t be too worried though.

In the past ten years, the defense industry has seen record profits.  In 2011, the combined profits of the five largest U.S.-based contractors were a staggering $13.4 billion.  And, despite going through a recession that devastated both families and business across the country, the defense industry is still making record profits.  

FDR once said during World War II that, quote, "I don't want to see a single war millionaire created in the United States as a result of this world disaster.”

But, in this new age of never-ending war, whether it's waged on communists or terrorists, war profiteers are cashing in like never before. Glance across the Potomac from our nation’s capital, and you'll see enormous castles built up in gated communities - all belonging to today's class of war profiteers.

And thanks to these war profiteers and Republican war hawks, it’s ingrained in the American psyche that any decrease in military spending means an automatic increase in the danger that Americans face in their everyday lives.  

America has finally reached the top flights of the military industrial congressional complex that President Eisenhower warned us about in his famous 1961 farewell address.

So isn’t time we knocked down this military industrial complex of ours? Isn’t it time we eliminated a wasteful and outdated military project, instead of threatening to take away the healthcare of millions of Americans? Shouldn’t we stop firing teachers in order to pad the wallets of defense contractors? 

America is the strongest military power in the world. And that’s not going to change anytime soon. But wouldn’t it be better if we were the strongest military power in the world and the nation that cared the most about the health and prosperity of its citizens, and the education of its future generations?

It’s time we grounded the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program and other wasteful defense spending projects for good, and spent their vast sums of money to rebuild our economy, and to rebuild the middle class.

Monday, July 2, 2012

Money Talks...And People (Shouldn't) Listen

Two of the wealthiest men in the world - that just happen to be Republican talking heads - hit the social media and television circuits this weekend - to give their two cents on the upcoming election in November.

First - we have Mr. Bad Hair Day himself THE Donald.  This morning on Fox So-Called News' Fox and Friends, Trump told the show hosts that Chief Justice Roberts wanted to "be loved by the Washington establishment," and that's why he sided with the liberals in the Obamacare decision.

First - anyone in politics and political punditry knows that's absolutely wrong.  But - since Trump said it - the hosts on Fox listened - and accepted the BS as they do oh so well.

But what's the bigger picture here? The fact of the matter is Donald Trump - despite having no background in politics - has become one of THE voices of the Republican party. He has somehow developed so much clout and power that hopeful Republican presidential nominees had to court his vote during the primary season - and Mitt Romney made a show out of his endorsement.

Bottom line Donald Trump knows nothing about politics and what America needs - and yet we and the mainstream media let him speak - and even worse - let him influence us.  He cares about what keeps the most money in his pockets and that's it

Now - moving on to Rupert Murdoch - media mogul - billionaire - and owner of the Fox So-Called News media farce.  Anyway - this weekend - Murdoch tweeted that he though Mitt Romney had no shot of beating President Obama unless he switched up his campaign staff and got some new faces in. 

Again - this man knows nothing about politics - has never held a political office - and yet he still thinks people are going to listen to what he has to say.  And the scary thing is - people do

Somehow - in America - the more money someone has - the more influence they get - whether it's deserved or not. And this HAS to change....

Thursday, May 10, 2012

Smart Guy

A quick post today - two things to say:

1. If you haven't ready articles by Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi yet - read them.  He is one of the best political writers at calling it like he sees it - and more often than not - he's totally on point

2. Taibbi was on CNN today - and said journalists do not think election will be close, only say so to ‘Sell Advertising’ - and he's right.  In just about every poll out there - Obama is beating Romney by double digits - and even beating him in some swing states.  BUT according to the media - this race is oh so close. A great example of the media will play up any story and throw in some added suspense just to pad their bottom-line - even if the story isn't true...


Take a look CNN interview with Taibbi below:

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/matt-taibbi-journalists-do-not-think-election-will-be-close-only-say-so-to-sell-advertising/


Friday, May 4, 2012

Comedians Know Best

Say what you want about the guy - but Stephen Colbert might be the best journalist in America - and he's not a journalist...

Colbert was on The Today Show this morning - in an interview to promote his new "childrens" book.  However - David Gregory first talked to him about the Presidential race and about the politics that Colbert loves to bash every night.

Gregory asked Colbert what he thought the election would come down to - what would be the deciding factor - and Colbert jokingly replied - “It comes down who has been crueler to a dog...Apparently it comes down to whether or not it’s crueler for an adult man to strap a dog to his car and then drive for 12 hours, or for a 10-year-old boy to eat dog given to him by his stepfather. As far as I can tell that’s the biggest differentiation.”

And while this was clearly meant as a joke in typical Colbert style - if you really think about it - it's not much of a joke at all...it's the truth.

Over the course of this endless election cycle - there's been very little talk on issues that actually matter - but a ton of talk on theater of the absurd kind of material.

Early in the process - Herman Cain's inability to keep his junk in his pants turned into a bigger "political issue" than the economy.  The same can be said for Newt too.

And then fast forward a month or two - and a giant bomb is dropped on the American political landscape.  Mitt Romney - the man who could be President - strapped his dog to the roof of his car for 12 hours on a family roadtrip.

Don't get me wrong - anyone who knows me knows I am a complete sucker for dogs - and have had them all my life.  I think what Romney and his family did was deplorable - and Romney really should be arrested for animal cruelty and then some.

BUT - with an economy in turmoil - a broken healthcare system - an environment on the brink of diaster - and our nation involved in never-ending war in Afghanistan - should the media and our society really have allowed "Doggate" to have become such a large issue in the 2012 campaign?

And then - like you knew they would - the Republican Party found a way to strike back at President Obama and the Democrats..duh duh duhhhh.

As a child - on a family vacation to Indonesia - President Obama ate dog that was given to him by his stepfather. It should be noted that like many countries in Asia - dog is a food eaten in Indonesia.

Republicans latched on to this story - and fired back at Obama and the Democrats with all their might - how can a man be President if one time when he was a little child - he tried the native food of his family's homeland?

The point is - neither President Obama eating dog - or Mitt Romney being an animal abuser - are issues that are going to help America overcome the several hurdles it is facing.

And yet - since these have been made into huge issues - and the real issues have had comparatively less debate - Stephen Colbert might be right.

When Americans head to the polls in November - they may very well be forced to decide who to vote for based on who hates dogs more...


See The Today Show interview with Stephen Colbert at the link below:

Colbert Today Show Interview

Say It Like You Mean It

David Frum was a close advisor to the Bush Administration - and was Bush's speechwriter and special assistant between 2001 and 2002.

His time at the White House is probably most memorable for creating the now infamous "axis of evil" term that Bush lived off of for the next 6 years.

Frum is an interesting character. Growing up in Canada - he was originally about as liberal as you could get. He was very active in the liberal party in Canada as a politically active teenager. However - he had an ideology shift and became a Republican around the time he was 20 years old.

This shift in ideologies gives Frum the unique ability to see the political world from both sides - and see political media coverage from both sides.

In recent years - Frum has been incredibly outspoken on the current state of the Republican Party - arguing that it has become a party that essentially works for Conservative media powerhouses like Fox News and Rush Limbaugh.

Similarly - he argues that at the heart of Conservative media - is this need to create conflict out of seemingly nothing issues.  According to Frum - creating these wedge issues is what drives the success - or failure - of Conservative outlets like Fox.

I'm not trying to only bash on Fox here - in recent years - MSNBC and CNN have become very similar - making little things coming out of the Republican Party seem like major issues.

And this is another problem with news media in the US today.  These networks - and talkshow powerhouses like Rush  - are creating issues out of non-issues and basically controlling debate in America.

In a 2010 interview on ABC's Nightline - Frum famously said, "Republicans originally thought that Fox worked for us and now we're discovering we work for Fox. And this balance has been completely reversed. The thing that sustains a strong Fox network is the thing that undermines a strong Republican Party."

The very notion that a political party and a media outlet could be so inexplicably linked is incredibly scary - and is a consequence of the destruction of real journalism and news in America...

Take a look at this David Frum interview from last year on CNN - he really sums it up well..


Thursday, May 3, 2012

The Mainstream Miss

Every day - a cable news outlet will latch on to one story and run with it all day.  Soon - the other networks will follow - so they can say they had the best coverage on the same story.

For instance - today - a lot of the talk was about last night's episode of Rock Center on NBC - where Brian Williams went inside the so-called Situation Room in the White House - and re-capped the events leading up to the death of Osama Bin Laden.

MSNBC of course lauded the episode for it's hardcore journalism. Fox News of course attacked it, President Obama and NBC for turning the killing of Bin Laden into a political issue.  And CNN chimed in a little too.

Meanwhile - actual news - news that Americans should care about - was happening - but no one was broadcasting it.

For instance - a new study released today revealed CEO pay has increased 127 times faster than regular worker pay over the last 30 years.

That is a startling statistic - and one of the statistics behind why there is so much income inequality in America.  It is one of the reasons President Obama and the current administration wants to create comprehensive tax reform. And despite how startling this fact is - no one talked about it today.

This isn't just an exception. This is the norm.  Mainstream media in America misses so much actual news everyday - news that matters - while they repeat over and over again the one story they think is the most important thing ever...

The Fox on The Left

Mediaite published a story today talking about how Al Qaeda thought MSNBC was "neutral" until it decided to fire Keith Olbermann. The original article link is below...

http://www.mediaite.com/online/osama-bin-laden-thought-msnbc-neutral-until-keith-olbermann-firing/

This got me to thinking - has MSNBC really ever been a neutral cable news network? Sure, maybe 10 years ago it was - and maybe at it's inception that was the goal. But let's be honest - MSNBC is not a neutral news network. MSNBC has become the Fox-Not-News of the Left. 

It's no secret Fox News is the mouth of the Republican Party - pretty much every word that comes out of the network is critical of President Obama or the Democratic Party in one way or another.

But the same political favoritism can be said of MSNBC. Chris Matthews and Lawrence O'Donnell and the rest of the crew attack the Republican Party on a regular basis. 

This is the problem with cable news media in America today.  There is no news.  What settles for "news" are political talking points from either the Left or the Right, and a constant stream of opinion and criticism.

As a result - those who watch "the news" form their own political beliefs based on half-truths and misinformation - which in turn leads to one incredibly uninformed and misguided electorate...

Where has true journalism - a straight narration of the facts and of the issues - gone? Because it sure isn't on America's television screens....